Share this post on:

O BioMed Central and take full advantage of:?Convenient online submission
O BioMed Central and take full advantage of:?Convenient online submission ?Thorough peer review ?No space constraints or color figure charges ?Immediate publication on acceptance ?Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar ?Research which is freely available for redistributionSubmit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit
RetrovirologyPoster presentationBioMed CentralOpen AccessComparative biochemical analysis of wildtype and drug resistant HIV-1 integrase subtypes B and CTamara Bar-Magen*1, Richard D Sloan1, Emily I McDonough1,2, Verena Faltenbacher1, D Aaron Donahue1,2, Bjorn D Kuhl1,3, Hongtao Xu1 and Mark A Wainberg1,2,Address: 1McGill University AIDS Centre, Lady Davis Institute-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada and 3Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada * Corresponding authorfrom Frontiers of Retrovirology: Complex retroviruses, retroelements and their hosts Montpellier, France. 21-23 September 2009 Published: 24 September 2009 Retrovirology PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27607577 2009, 6(Suppl 2):P6 doi:10.1186/1742-4690-6-S2-P Meeting abstracts – A single PDF containing all abstracts in this Supplement is available here. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1742-4690-6-S2-info.pdf This abstract is available from: http://www.retrovirology.com/content/6/S2/P6 ?2009 Bar-Magen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.ObjectivesSubtype specific differences in the development of drug resistance mutations have been reported for reverse transcriptase and protease. Therefore, it is also important to compare the enzymatic activities of purified HIV-1 integrase (IN) from subtypes B and C in the wildtype (wt) enzymes, as well as those containing drug resistance mutations. We now report on the enzymatic activities of both wt IN enzymes and those containing either the E92Q or N155H mutations or both mutations together.ResultsOur results indicate that the enzymatic activities of wt subtype B and C integrases are not significantly different, suggesting that there is little variation between subtypes B and C in PNPP web regard to integrase function. In addition, wt enzymes of both subtypes displayed similar sensitivity to the IN inhibitors. The double mutant E92Q/N155H enzymes showed higher resistance to IN PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488460 inhibitors than did enzymes containing only single mutations, and differences between mutated enzymes of subtype B versus C origin in regard to levels of resistance were demonstrable but not pronounced. This is the first report on the enzymatic activity of both wt and drug resistant subtype C IN enzymes.MethodsTo evaluate the enzymatic activities from non-B subtypes we cloned subtype C IN from pINDIE-C1 into a prokaryotic protein expression vector, inserted solubility mutations, described previously for subtype B IN, and resistance mutations utilizing site-directed mutagenesis. We then expressed and purified the relevant proteins. The catalytic activities of both wt enzymes were analyzed through biochemical assays for 3′ processing and strand transfer (3′ P and ST respectively). An extensive biochemical characterization of all purified integrase enzymes was performed, both in the presence and absen.

Share this post on:

Author: Interleukin Related