The investigator did not include control participants in the sampling frame

The investigator did not include control participants in the sampling frame because their Beclabuvir side effects exposure to yoga differed significantly from that of the yoga intervention participants. A total of 36 yoga intervention participants (88 of 41) returned the 15-month postintervention questionnaires. Stratification of the sampling frame by the reported duration of postintervention yoga practice narrowed the selection of interviewees even further. Individuals who reported practicing yoga at 15 months postintervention (n = 5) were classified as having long-term yoga practice, and those who practiced yoga for at least 3 months but fewer than 15 months postintervention were classified as having midterm yoga practice (n = 14). Individuals who stopped yoga prior to the 3-month postintervention follow-up assessment were classified as having short-term yoga practice (n = 17). See Figure 1 for a stratification flow diagram.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptDiabetes Educ. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 22.Alexander et al.PageRequests for interviews began with participants who had long-term yoga practice. Of these 5 individuals, 3 agreed to participate (one of whom preferred to answer questions via e-mail), 1 declined (because of health problems), and 1 did not respond. Following that, 13 of the 14 individuals who had midterm yoga practice (one individual had health problems interfering with completion of the yoga intervention) were contacted. Of these 13 individuals, 7 agreed to participate, 4 declined (because of time constraints or health problems), and 2 did not respond. For the individuals who reported short-term yoga practice, the investigator used a table of random numbers to determine the order of contact because there were no predetermined criteria by which to select individuals who had not maintained yoga. Interviews were requested from 6 of these individuals; 3 agreed, 2 did not respond, and 1 was unable to participate (because of distance). Data Collection At the DAYS and WHYS baseline assessment, each Zebularine price participant completed basic demographic forms, containing data such as age, gender, marital status, race/ethnicity, education, and employment. Follow-up questionnaires were administered by mail at 3, 6, and 15 months postintervention. One of these questionnaires contained a dichotomous (yes/ no) response item regarding current yoga practice that was used for sampling purposes in the current study. The primary mode of data collection in this qualitative study was face-to-face, semistructured interviews. The interview began with an assessment of the participant’s current yoga practice, followed by an inquiry regarding reasons for continuing or stopping yoga. Additional questions included the following: How would you describe a typical yoga session? What do you consider “regular” or consistent yoga practice? What makes you feel the best about doing yoga? What do you find most difficult about doing yoga on a regular basis? How would you say that practicing yoga has affected your overall lifestyle? Each interview lasted approximately 30 to 45 minutes and was held at the participant’s chosen location. The interviews were audiotaped with the permission of the participants and transcribed verbatim into separate word-processing documents containing only study identification numbers and no personal identifiers. One participant preferred to communicate via e-mail; textual data from these e-mails were save.The investigator did not include control participants in the sampling frame because their exposure to yoga differed significantly from that of the yoga intervention participants. A total of 36 yoga intervention participants (88 of 41) returned the 15-month postintervention questionnaires. Stratification of the sampling frame by the reported duration of postintervention yoga practice narrowed the selection of interviewees even further. Individuals who reported practicing yoga at 15 months postintervention (n = 5) were classified as having long-term yoga practice, and those who practiced yoga for at least 3 months but fewer than 15 months postintervention were classified as having midterm yoga practice (n = 14). Individuals who stopped yoga prior to the 3-month postintervention follow-up assessment were classified as having short-term yoga practice (n = 17). See Figure 1 for a stratification flow diagram.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptDiabetes Educ. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 22.Alexander et al.PageRequests for interviews began with participants who had long-term yoga practice. Of these 5 individuals, 3 agreed to participate (one of whom preferred to answer questions via e-mail), 1 declined (because of health problems), and 1 did not respond. Following that, 13 of the 14 individuals who had midterm yoga practice (one individual had health problems interfering with completion of the yoga intervention) were contacted. Of these 13 individuals, 7 agreed to participate, 4 declined (because of time constraints or health problems), and 2 did not respond. For the individuals who reported short-term yoga practice, the investigator used a table of random numbers to determine the order of contact because there were no predetermined criteria by which to select individuals who had not maintained yoga. Interviews were requested from 6 of these individuals; 3 agreed, 2 did not respond, and 1 was unable to participate (because of distance). Data Collection At the DAYS and WHYS baseline assessment, each participant completed basic demographic forms, containing data such as age, gender, marital status, race/ethnicity, education, and employment. Follow-up questionnaires were administered by mail at 3, 6, and 15 months postintervention. One of these questionnaires contained a dichotomous (yes/ no) response item regarding current yoga practice that was used for sampling purposes in the current study. The primary mode of data collection in this qualitative study was face-to-face, semistructured interviews. The interview began with an assessment of the participant’s current yoga practice, followed by an inquiry regarding reasons for continuing or stopping yoga. Additional questions included the following: How would you describe a typical yoga session? What do you consider “regular” or consistent yoga practice? What makes you feel the best about doing yoga? What do you find most difficult about doing yoga on a regular basis? How would you say that practicing yoga has affected your overall lifestyle? Each interview lasted approximately 30 to 45 minutes and was held at the participant’s chosen location. The interviews were audiotaped with the permission of the participants and transcribed verbatim into separate word-processing documents containing only study identification numbers and no personal identifiers. One participant preferred to communicate via e-mail; textual data from these e-mails were save.