O dichotomize responses as “# High School” or “. High School”. Clinical characteristics

O dichotomize responses as “# High School” or “. High School”. Clinical characteristics (CSRG sample only). Time since SSc diagnosis and time from first non-Raynaud’s disease manifestation were recorded by study physicians. Skin Lixisenatide biological activity involvement was assessed using the modified Rodnan skin score [32], a widely used clinical assessment where the examining rheumatologist 76932-56-4 supplier records the degree of skin thickening from 0 (no involvement) to 3 (severe thickening) in 17 body areas (total score range 0?1). Patients were classified into limited and diffuse cutaneous subsets based on Leroy’s definition [33].Data AnalysesThe percentages of women with SSc and women from the general UK population who reported being sexually active were calculated, and rate ratio analyses were conducted, stratified by age group and marital status. Among those reporting being sexually active, rates of sexual impairment (FSFI total #22.5) were compared similarly across samples by age and marital status. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the independent contributions of sample group (CSRG or UK general population), age in years and marital status to sexual activity status and impairment status. Post-hoc analyses including education level as an additional variable in the regression models were also performed. In addition, separate multivariate logistic models wererun to compare the subset of patients with limited SSc versus the general population sample, and then the subset of patients with diffuse SSc versus the general population sample. Discrimination and calibration of the logistic regression models were assessed with the c-index and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodnessof-fit test statistic (HL), respectively [34]. The c-index is the percentage of comparisons where sexually active (or sexually impaired) patients had a higher predicted probability of being sexually active (or sexually impaired) than inactive patients (or non-impaired patients), for all possible pairs of active and inactive patients (or impaired and non-impaired patients). The HL is a measure of the accuracy of the predicted number of cases of active or impaired patients compared to the number of patients who actually reported sexual activity or impairment across the spectrum of probabilities. A relatively large p value indicates that the model fits reasonably well. In order to identify areas of sexual function that are particularly problematic for women with SSc, sexual domain scores were calculated among women who were sexually active, and analysis of covariance was used to assess the differences in each sexual domain score between women with SSc and women from the general population sample, controlling for total FSFI scores. Analyses were also performed using Pearson’s correlations to determine the correlation between domain scores for the domains that were found to have significantly worse scores among women with scleroderma compared to the general population. This was done to assess the degree to which important problem areas for women with SSc seemed to represent general disease severity versus specific problems that may be independent of each other. Finally, among sexually active women in both samples, Pearson’s correlations were used to assess the association between FSFI total and individual sexual domain scores and sexual satisfaction. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.0 (Chicago, IL), and statistical tests were 2-sided with a P,0.05 significance level.Table 1. Comp.O dichotomize responses as “# High School” or “. High School”. Clinical characteristics (CSRG sample only). Time since SSc diagnosis and time from first non-Raynaud’s disease manifestation were recorded by study physicians. Skin involvement was assessed using the modified Rodnan skin score [32], a widely used clinical assessment where the examining rheumatologist records the degree of skin thickening from 0 (no involvement) to 3 (severe thickening) in 17 body areas (total score range 0?1). Patients were classified into limited and diffuse cutaneous subsets based on Leroy’s definition [33].Data AnalysesThe percentages of women with SSc and women from the general UK population who reported being sexually active were calculated, and rate ratio analyses were conducted, stratified by age group and marital status. Among those reporting being sexually active, rates of sexual impairment (FSFI total #22.5) were compared similarly across samples by age and marital status. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the independent contributions of sample group (CSRG or UK general population), age in years and marital status to sexual activity status and impairment status. Post-hoc analyses including education level as an additional variable in the regression models were also performed. In addition, separate multivariate logistic models wererun to compare the subset of patients with limited SSc versus the general population sample, and then the subset of patients with diffuse SSc versus the general population sample. Discrimination and calibration of the logistic regression models were assessed with the c-index and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodnessof-fit test statistic (HL), respectively [34]. The c-index is the percentage of comparisons where sexually active (or sexually impaired) patients had a higher predicted probability of being sexually active (or sexually impaired) than inactive patients (or non-impaired patients), for all possible pairs of active and inactive patients (or impaired and non-impaired patients). The HL is a measure of the accuracy of the predicted number of cases of active or impaired patients compared to the number of patients who actually reported sexual activity or impairment across the spectrum of probabilities. A relatively large p value indicates that the model fits reasonably well. In order to identify areas of sexual function that are particularly problematic for women with SSc, sexual domain scores were calculated among women who were sexually active, and analysis of covariance was used to assess the differences in each sexual domain score between women with SSc and women from the general population sample, controlling for total FSFI scores. Analyses were also performed using Pearson’s correlations to determine the correlation between domain scores for the domains that were found to have significantly worse scores among women with scleroderma compared to the general population. This was done to assess the degree to which important problem areas for women with SSc seemed to represent general disease severity versus specific problems that may be independent of each other. Finally, among sexually active women in both samples, Pearson’s correlations were used to assess the association between FSFI total and individual sexual domain scores and sexual satisfaction. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.0 (Chicago, IL), and statistical tests were 2-sided with a P,0.05 significance level.Table 1. Comp.