Socio-economic background ranged from decrease to upper middle SES.Zegwaard et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:103

Socio-economic background ranged from decrease to upper middle SES.Zegwaard et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:103 http:www.biomedcentral.com1471-244X13Page 3 ofTable 1 Demographic and background info of caregivers (N=19)Age in years Sort of partnership with care receiver Partner Child Buddy or Relative Self reported wellness problems of caregivers Physical difficulties Depression Duration of care (years) 11 1 M=24, Range=2-40 12 (male 6) 3 (male two) four (male two) M=66, SD=9.Information collectionThe caregivers were interviewed for the duration of a single face-to-face interview. The interviews have been audio-taped and lasted in between 60 and 90 minutes. A subject list (see Further file 1) primarily based on literature to conditions that could possibly influence the caregiving burden offered direction towards the interviews. Caregivers had been asked to describe details of events, conditions and conversations together with the care-receiver, related to caregiving in their day-to-day life. To offer the caregiver the opportunity to speak as GSK2838232 supplier freely as possible through the interview, it was sought to make a pleasant atmosphere. Because of this the interviews had been conducted at a location suggested by the caregiver (largely their very own dwelling), and within the care receiver’s absence. The interviews followed the organic course of conversation. The topic list was applied to introduce these subjects that were not introduced spontaneously by the interviewee. Questions had been asked to have in to a lot more detail about what was brought in by the interviewee. Field notes concerning impressions gained during the interview and details provided after the tape recorder was turned off had been noted instantly afterwards. This procedure generated sensitive and private interview material around the influence of caregiving on the daily life in the respondents.Information analysisfurther interviews had been performed, and PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21310042 the established concepts and themes were alternate confronted using the input of new material. Throughout meetings M.I.Z. and M.G. continuously compared their interpretations with the information and worked towards consensus about the interpretation of attainable meanings. Commonalities, variations, and explanations for variations between interviews were discussed for a more thorough understanding on the caregivers’ point of view and experiences. Comparing and contrasting components within and between cases enabled disclosure of what was shared and what was diverse. A reflection on this analysis was described, text parts had been coded as well as a code tree was developed. Coding was supported by the software program system MAXqda. For the purposes of enhanced researcher triangulation, a third researcher (M.J.A.) was involved in the analysis. She critically questioned the conclusions primarily based on the interpretation on the data. This approach provides an external verify on the study. During these meetings all 3 worked together in checking the interpretation on the data against current information and new supplies. As such we regularly verified whether interpretations corresponded towards the original interviews. New codes had been added as well as the code-tree was restructured in accordance with theoretical insights. Coding and notion description were conducted simultaneously, facilitating the interpretative analytical approach that finest relates to the expertise with the caregivers. Ideas have been further categorized and primary themes emerged [27,28]. Relations in between categories and in between themes had been established and categories developed.The analyses were performed within a cyclical process in which coding and think.