Ion correctly, while ASD participants gave correct answers but had less

Ion correctly, while ASD participants gave correct answers but had less correct physical and emotion-based ToM responses. Potentially significant variations in the responses of TD individuals may be masked by a ceiling effect of the test. Future studies may work to remedy this ceiling effect by adding more stories and/or more difficult stories to the assessment. Future Directions Whereas the results of this study provided evidence that both children and adults with ASD had difficulty with making inferences, we did not directly relate their abilities in this cognitive skill to their ability in the comprehension of discourse. Further work in this area should investigate this relationship as well as including more direct Abamectin B1a site assessment of contextual integration, another potentially important contributor to the processing of discourse that may be affected in ASD. Given the age effects obtained in the current study, an instrument such as the PIT may be useful for longitudinal or cross-sectional studies in which children and adults with ASD are compared to further examine the developmental progression of comprehension in general and inference making more specifically. The PIT could also be utilized in treatment efficacy and effectiveness studies in order to evaluate potential improvements in discourse processing as the result of ASD interventions. Finally, measurement of drawing inferences from various types of ML240 side effects social and non-social information may be clinically useful, identifying specific areas that could be the target of intervention for improving comprehension of discourse in both academic and social situations. Conclusions In conclusion, the current study extends the literature by reporting not only inference making difficulties in individuals with ASD, but more importantly identifies relevant types of inference making deficits (e.g. emotion related) in this population. More encouraging, are the reported improvements related to age and linguistic level in some types of inference making abilities, though these do not appear to extend to emotion-related inferences.AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge the support of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [HD055748, an Autism Center of Excellence, to N.J.M.]; and, the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) [K23DC006691 to D.L.W.]. We are grateful to the participants and familiesJ Autism Dev Disord. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 September 01.Bodner et al.Page 16 who generously gave of their time and effort to this study. We acknowledge the contribution of Amanda Brening, Kelsey Woods, and Maureen McAniff in the development of the PIT. KEB would like to thank Denis McCarthy for his guidance and feedback on the development of the psychometric properties of the PIT. We thank Rob Mason for his contribution of stimuli that were important in the developmental process.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
HHS Public AccessAuthor manuscriptAm Sociol Rev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 February 01.Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2015 February ; 80(1): 116?39. doi:10.1177/0003122414564008.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptCan We Finish the Revolution? Gender, Work-Family Ideals, and Institutional ConstraintDavid S. Pedulla* and University of Texas at Austin Sarah Th aud* University of California, Santa BarbaraAbstractWhy has progress toward ge.Ion correctly, while ASD participants gave correct answers but had less correct physical and emotion-based ToM responses. Potentially significant variations in the responses of TD individuals may be masked by a ceiling effect of the test. Future studies may work to remedy this ceiling effect by adding more stories and/or more difficult stories to the assessment. Future Directions Whereas the results of this study provided evidence that both children and adults with ASD had difficulty with making inferences, we did not directly relate their abilities in this cognitive skill to their ability in the comprehension of discourse. Further work in this area should investigate this relationship as well as including more direct assessment of contextual integration, another potentially important contributor to the processing of discourse that may be affected in ASD. Given the age effects obtained in the current study, an instrument such as the PIT may be useful for longitudinal or cross-sectional studies in which children and adults with ASD are compared to further examine the developmental progression of comprehension in general and inference making more specifically. The PIT could also be utilized in treatment efficacy and effectiveness studies in order to evaluate potential improvements in discourse processing as the result of ASD interventions. Finally, measurement of drawing inferences from various types of social and non-social information may be clinically useful, identifying specific areas that could be the target of intervention for improving comprehension of discourse in both academic and social situations. Conclusions In conclusion, the current study extends the literature by reporting not only inference making difficulties in individuals with ASD, but more importantly identifies relevant types of inference making deficits (e.g. emotion related) in this population. More encouraging, are the reported improvements related to age and linguistic level in some types of inference making abilities, though these do not appear to extend to emotion-related inferences.AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge the support of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [HD055748, an Autism Center of Excellence, to N.J.M.]; and, the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) [K23DC006691 to D.L.W.]. We are grateful to the participants and familiesJ Autism Dev Disord. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 September 01.Bodner et al.Page 16 who generously gave of their time and effort to this study. We acknowledge the contribution of Amanda Brening, Kelsey Woods, and Maureen McAniff in the development of the PIT. KEB would like to thank Denis McCarthy for his guidance and feedback on the development of the psychometric properties of the PIT. We thank Rob Mason for his contribution of stimuli that were important in the developmental process.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
HHS Public AccessAuthor manuscriptAm Sociol Rev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 February 01.Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2015 February ; 80(1): 116?39. doi:10.1177/0003122414564008.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptCan We Finish the Revolution? Gender, Work-Family Ideals, and Institutional ConstraintDavid S. Pedulla* and University of Texas at Austin Sarah Th aud* University of California, Santa BarbaraAbstractWhy has progress toward ge.