That 6 of tweets included in this study contained only cognitive IER

That 6 of tweets included in this study contained only cognitive IER (i.e., they did not also contain behavioral terms), while 9 of tweets contained only behavioral IER (i.e., they did not also contain cognitive terms). Despite the KU55933 overlap between cognitive and behavioral IER, both purchase 221244-14-0 appeared to have distinct relations with popularity. The use of tweets connoting cognitive IER had a small negative relationship with users’ popularity, r = -0.02, p < 0.05 (95 CIs -0.04, -0.001), whereas use of behavioral IER in tweets was positively related to popularity, r = 0.12, p < 0.01 (95 CIs 0.10, 0.14). Among the tweets that included only cognitive or only behavioral IER, there were stronger correlations with popularity in the same direction as those reported above (cognitive IER, r = -0.18, p < 0.01; behavioral IER, r = 0.16, p < 0.01). A regression analysis was then conducted, in which the age of the Twitter account and the total number of tweets users had sent out were controlled for in Step 1 (to account for differences in time to gain followers and usage of Twitter), and both types of IER were entered as predictors in Step 2 (Table 4). The results at Step 2 indicated that use of behavioral IER in one's tweets was positively related to network popularity, = 0.49, p < 0.01 (95 CIs 0.45, 0.53), while cognitive IER was negatively related to popularity, = -0.44, p < 0.01 (95 CIs -0.48, -0.39). At Step 3 the interaction between cognitive and behavioral IER was added to the model to determine whether presence of both cognitive and behavioral terms in tweets would have additional predictive value in terms of popularity. The interaction was not significant, < 0.01, ns (95 CIs -0.01, 0.02). The findings of this study, therefore, replicate the first study in suggesting that IER may be associated with the development of new connections with others, but present a moreTABLE 4 | Regression analysis predicting Twitter popularity in Study 2. Number of followers Step 1 Age of the account (days) 0.17 0.55 0.18 0.56 -0.44 0.49 0.18 0.56 -0.44 0.49 <0.01 11.43 36.26 11.94 37.42 -19.68 22.06 11.95 37.34 -19.22 22.05 0.51 <0.01 0.ptRTABLE 3 | Correlations between main study variables in Study 2. Mean 1. Age of the account (days) 2. Number of tweets 3. Number of followers 4. Use of cognitive IER terms in tweets 5. Use of behavioral IER terms in tweets 842.69 493.91 463.82 0.22 0.26 SD 523.11 497.80 3751.05 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.20 0.04 0.03 0.21 0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.12 0.76 1 2 3Number of tweets Step 2 Age of the account (days) Number of tweets Use of cognitive IER terms in tweets Use of behavioral IER terms in tweets Step 3 Age of the account (days) Number of tweets Use of cognitive IER terms in tweets Use of behavioral IER terms in tweets Interaction: cognitive ?behavioral IER Total R2 N = 8605; p < 0.05, < 0.01.0.0.N = 8605; Number of followers is analyzed in raw form for mean and SD, and as a logarithmic transform for correlations p < 0.05, p <0.01.Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.orgSeptember 2015 | Volume 6 | ArticleNiven et al.Interpersonal emotion regulation and popularitynuanced picture, at least for online connections, in suggesting that only behavioral strategies may be positively related to popularity.General DiscussionHow do we make connections when we enter a new social situation? The present research suggests that making attempts to improve others' emotions may facilitate the formation of new relationships. Across two.That 6 of tweets included in this study contained only cognitive IER (i.e., they did not also contain behavioral terms), while 9 of tweets contained only behavioral IER (i.e., they did not also contain cognitive terms). Despite the overlap between cognitive and behavioral IER, both appeared to have distinct relations with popularity. The use of tweets connoting cognitive IER had a small negative relationship with users' popularity, r = -0.02, p < 0.05 (95 CIs -0.04, -0.001), whereas use of behavioral IER in tweets was positively related to popularity, r = 0.12, p < 0.01 (95 CIs 0.10, 0.14). Among the tweets that included only cognitive or only behavioral IER, there were stronger correlations with popularity in the same direction as those reported above (cognitive IER, r = -0.18, p < 0.01; behavioral IER, r = 0.16, p < 0.01). A regression analysis was then conducted, in which the age of the Twitter account and the total number of tweets users had sent out were controlled for in Step 1 (to account for differences in time to gain followers and usage of Twitter), and both types of IER were entered as predictors in Step 2 (Table 4). The results at Step 2 indicated that use of behavioral IER in one's tweets was positively related to network popularity, = 0.49, p < 0.01 (95 CIs 0.45, 0.53), while cognitive IER was negatively related to popularity, = -0.44, p < 0.01 (95 CIs -0.48, -0.39). At Step 3 the interaction between cognitive and behavioral IER was added to the model to determine whether presence of both cognitive and behavioral terms in tweets would have additional predictive value in terms of popularity. The interaction was not significant, < 0.01, ns (95 CIs -0.01, 0.02). The findings of this study, therefore, replicate the first study in suggesting that IER may be associated with the development of new connections with others, but present a moreTABLE 4 | Regression analysis predicting Twitter popularity in Study 2. Number of followers Step 1 Age of the account (days) 0.17 0.55 0.18 0.56 -0.44 0.49 0.18 0.56 -0.44 0.49 <0.01 11.43 36.26 11.94 37.42 -19.68 22.06 11.95 37.34 -19.22 22.05 0.51 <0.01 0.ptRTABLE 3 | Correlations between main study variables in Study 2. Mean 1. Age of the account (days) 2. Number of tweets 3. Number of followers 4. Use of cognitive IER terms in tweets 5. Use of behavioral IER terms in tweets 842.69 493.91 463.82 0.22 0.26 SD 523.11 497.80 3751.05 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.20 0.04 0.03 0.21 0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.12 0.76 1 2 3Number of tweets Step 2 Age of the account (days) Number of tweets Use of cognitive IER terms in tweets Use of behavioral IER terms in tweets Step 3 Age of the account (days) Number of tweets Use of cognitive IER terms in tweets Use of behavioral IER terms in tweets Interaction: cognitive ?behavioral IER Total R2 N = 8605; p < 0.05, < 0.01.0.0.N = 8605; Number of followers is analyzed in raw form for mean and SD, and as a logarithmic transform for correlations p < 0.05, p <0.01.Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.orgSeptember 2015 | Volume 6 | ArticleNiven et al.Interpersonal emotion regulation and popularitynuanced picture, at least for online connections, in suggesting that only behavioral strategies may be positively related to popularity.General DiscussionHow do we make connections when we enter a new social situation? The present research suggests that making attempts to improve others' emotions may facilitate the formation of new relationships. Across two.