Share this post on:

feration and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. The role of this regulatory pathway in breast cancer therapy was assessed. Materials and Methods Tissue Samples Proliferation and Apoptosis in Breast Cancer ded for histopathologic diagnosis and immunohistochemical analysis. Fresh samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after surgical removal and maintained at 280uC until used for Western blotting. All human tissue samples were collected using protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University. All the patients provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. It is approved by the ethics committees of Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University. The clinical features of the patients, including age, histologic grade, tumor size, metastasis, histology, as well as ER, PR and Her2 SAR 405 status, are shown in Immunohistochemical Methods Sections were deparaffinized using a graded ethanol series, and endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide. 12419798 Subsequently, the sections were processed in 10 mmol/ L citrate buffer and heated to 121uC in an autoclave machine for 20 minutes to retrieve the antigen. After rinsing with PBS, the sections were blocked with 10% goat serum for 1 hour at room temperature. The sections were then incubated overnight at 4uC with rabbit anti-human NLK polyclonal antibody, rabbit antihuman c-Myb polyclonal antibody and mouse anti-Ki-67 monoclonal antibody. Negative control slides were processed in parallel using a nonspecific immunoglobulin IgG at the same concentration as the primary antibody. All the slides were processed using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase method. After rinsing the sections with PBS, the peroxidase reaction product was visualized by incubating the sections with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride in 0.05 mol/L Tris buffer containing 0.03% H2O2. The sections were then rinsed with water, counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. All the immunostained sections were evaluated by observers blinded to the clinical and pathological parameters of the patients. In the event of disagreement, they reached a consensus via joint reevaluation of the tissue microarray using a multihead microscope. At least ten high-power fields were randomly chosen, and at least 500 cells/field were counted in each section. NLK and Ki-67 indices were determined as the percentage of all immunostained cells. The percentage of NLK-positive tumor cells ranged from 1.85% to 81.18%. The mean percentage of positive cells was 19.36%. The samples were considered NLK-positive when the percentage of positive cells was.19.36% and negative when the percentage was 19.36%. The immunostaining intensity was graded using three categories: strong, moderate, weak, or negative; a semiquantitative score was assigned using the following scale: less than 5% of NLK-positive cells, 5%25% of positive cells, 26%50% of positive cells, 50%75% of positive cells, and greater than 75% of positive cells. Finally, all these scores were combined. If less than 5% of cells were immunostained, the case was considered negative. Using this procedure, the c-Myb immunohistochemical scores ranged from 0 to 12. Samples were considered positive 15340224 for c-Myb expression if the score was.3 and negative if the score was 3. The scores of core tumor tissue replicates were combined and used as one case. Immunohistochemical evaluation for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor

Share this post on:

Author: Interleukin Related